Amor Fati—Part I: Introduction

My yearning no longer paints dreamy colors across the veiled distances, my eyes are satisfied with what exists, because they have learned to see. The world has become lovelier than before.

The world has become lovelier. I am alone, and I don’t suffer from my loneliness. I don’t want life to be anything other than what it is.

—Hermann Hesse

The expression amor fati—love your fate—is most famously associated with the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. For Nietzsche, the goal of life was not the pursuit of happiness or comfort, not the avoidance of suffering, and certainly not blind obedience to any virtues or values conceived or dictated by other people. The goal of life, according to Nietzsche is this: affirmation.

Affirming life, to Nietzsche, meant not just tolerating or accepting life through difficult times and not just enjoying life’s positive aspects while they last, but finding a way to love life as it is, at all times, no matter what fate throws your way—beauty or ugliness, pain or bliss, justice or injustice, successes or failures, wins or losses, health or sickness, prosperity or poverty, adoration or hatred. All lives have positive and negative aspects. To ignore the negative aspects of life is to live a partial life—to live in denial.

Loving life, to Nietzsche, was not just about finding some positive aspects in it that balance or outweigh the negative ones, and not about enduring difficulties in hope of better days. Loving life, to Nietzsche, meant being willing to relive life in all its details, good and bad, over and over again—in exactly the same way, wishing for nothing to be different—to infinity. This idea is embodied in Nietzsche’s concept of “eternal recurrence.” Among Nietzsche’s prolific writings, perhaps the most poignant and succinct expression of the attitude of amor fati is embodied in these words by his protagonist, Zarathustra: “Was that life? Well then! Once more!”

In his book, Ecce Homo, Nietzsche wrote: “My formula for greatness in a human being is amor fati: that one wants nothing to be different, not forward, not backward, not in all eternity. Not merely bear what is necessary, still less conceal it […] but love it.”

Nietzsche criticized past philosophers for trying to lull people into the false belief that life, if lived under certain rules, restrictions, or prescribed virtues, can be easy, blissful, pleasant, free of suffering. Suffering, he believed, is an inevitable and necessary part of life. Enduring and overcoming suffering, no matter how unpleasant, ultimately give life meaning and foster such elevated feelings and qualities as inner strength, resilience, pride, self-worth, and courage.

I very much doubt there’s even one person reading who would not want some things about their life and about the world to be different. Certainly, I am not such a person. Of course, each of us likely, if asked whether we love life, may have different answers at different points in time. But this is not really the point of amor fati.

The point of adopting the attitude of amor fati—of loving fate—is to consider life as a whole, with all its ups and downs, joys and sufferings, beauty and wretchedness, hopes and despairs, through all of one’s lifetime, and to ask ourselves: if this is the only life we get, to repeat over and over in exactly the same way for all eternity, would we do the same rollercoaster ride all over again?

Nietzsche believed that the answer must be yes. In fact, he thought that the answer must be yes even if you’ve lived a difficult, painful life, if only you’ve had even just one experience of true awe and transcendence. As he put it: “If we affirm one moment, we thus affirm not only ourselves but all existence. For nothing is self-sufficient, neither in us ourselves nor in things; and if our soul has trembled with happiness and sounded like a harp string just once, all eternity was needed to produce this one event—and in this single moment of affirmation all eternity was called good, redeemed, justified, and affirmed.”

I can’t say for certain that I would affirm my own life so emphatically as Nietzsche suggested. I don’t think Nietzsche would have, either. A person capable of such absolute affirmation is one who would live up to Nietzsche’s idea of an Übermensch: an over-man (not “superman”: the ambiguous term sometimes used to describe fictional characters having supernatural abilities). However, I can absolutely affirm that intense experiences such as Nietzsche described—moments of awe and transcendence, periods of flow and aesthetic bliss—indeed make even my most challenging times bearable and worthy, if only by the mere knowledge that as I journey through life I may experience more of them.

The knowledge that such experiences are still possible and may await me if I persevere and hold onto life through times of suffering and despair, is the most powerful medicine I know of for some of my darkest states of mind. Being no stranger to such states, Nietzsche, too, remarked: “If you have your ‘why?’ in life, you can get along with almost any ‘how?'”.

In this new series of articles, my goal is share with you some of the ways I have found to affirm life by pursuing emotionally intense experiences—experiences of awe, transcendence, power, flow, and profound meaning—consciously and deliberately rather than leaving them to the whims of random chance.

These lessons, while varied and seemingly unrelated, have this in common: they all involve two essential factors that are at least to a degree within my control: circumstances and attitude. As one of Nietzsche’s own inspirations, Arthur Schopenhauer expressed it:

The world in which a man lives shapes itself chiefly by the way in which he looks at it, and so it proves different to different men; to one it is barren, dull, and superficial; to another rich, interesting, and full of meaning. On hearing of the interesting events which have happened in the course of a man’s experience, many people will wish that similar things had happened in their lives too, completely forgetting that they should be envious rather of the mental aptitude which lent those events the significance they possess when he describes them; to a man of genius they were interesting adventures; but to the dull perceptions of an ordinary individual they would have been stale, everyday occurrences.

Proceed to Part II: Vastness.

~ Please consider supporting my work using Patreon. ~

Patreon gives those who believe in supporting the arts a secure platform to give direct, ongoing support to their chosen creators and artists. You may toss as little as $2/month into the virtual tip jar, or as much as your budget and generosity will allow. You can do it for a month, or be a sustaining Patron for a longer period; it is entirely your choice. Regardless of the amount, your support allows me the freedom to continue to create. You are supporting my art and writing practice throughout the year, covering the times when it is impractical or impossible for me to get out to generate income through my personal appearances or workshops.

Any donation you choose to give is accepted with gratitude.
Become a patron at Patreon!

27 thoughts on “Amor Fati—Part I: Introduction

Add yours

  1. This really made me rethink how I view life itself, embracing the hard parts as much as the good makes the whole journey feel alive and meaningful.

  2. Thank you for sharing your journey of life and the perspective and inspiration of Nietzsche. Your view of life and and the world let’s us know that each person experiences the rules of life differently. This is an awesome and meaningful take on life. I look forward to reading more. It helped me renew my mind today on something I was experiences. Endure to the end.

  3. Dear Guy
    Thanks for your interesting introduction to Nietzsche’s work. My grandfather was a Nietzsche specialist. For me, Nietzsche and Schopenhauer were too pessimistic. The problem with Nietzsche’s work is the editing that was done by his fascist sister. She made his philosophy acceptable to the fascists.
    If you are really interested in Nietzsche, I can recommend the biography by Curt Paul Janz ‘Nietzsche’ (3 Vol.).
    The Fab Four of Cley
    🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂

    1. Thank you! Yes, I am well aware of Fr. Förster-Nietzsche’s disservice to her brother’s legacy. Thankfully, it has long been established that Nietzsche was neither a fascist nor an antisemite.
      Schopenhauer and Nietzsche are often described as pessimists, but I don’t think they were. They were realists, in the sense of acknowledging the negative aspects of life rather than denying them. Schopenhauer offered ways of finding meaning in life (through art and ascetic living) despite its negative aspects, and Nietzsche promoted affirming life despite its challenges. Neither of these are pessimistic attitudes.

  4. This was interesting, thank you! My first thought was that I don’t find circumstances under my control at all- I feel like the only things in life I control are my perspective and my reactions to circumstances. I have done my best to keep my wonder alive and well and find joy and awe in many things, often small. My favorite during winter is the sublimation of fields of snow. There is something magical about the natural process that chills me and also warms my heart. I hope you go into more depth about creating those circumstances and also how it might inform how we interact with each other.

    I was also struck by the similarities in some religious teachings, particularly “Joy and Spiritual Survival”, a talk about finding joy in any circumstance by Russell M. Nelson (Link below if anyone wants it). Of course, for that talk, faith in Jesus is the cause of the joy, but I think it’s a complement to what you shared about Nietzche with a different focus. I know historically, religion has given meaning to lives and personally I find joy and awe in worship.
    https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2016/10/joy-and-spiritual-survival?lang=eng

    1. Thank you! The approach you describe—having no control of circumstances, only of how you respond to them—is in line with the philosophy of Stoicism, which is still very popular and widely practiced today despite being well over 2,000 years old. That’s a testament to how useful and relatable it is.

      Still, later philosophies challenged this approach. For example, existentialists believed that only some of your circumstances are dictated from the outside (they called these “facticity”), but that people still always have at least some circumstances where they are free to make their own choices and to shape their lives according to their own values (they called that “transcendence”).

      Nietzsche was famously opposed to the religion of Christianity, but he was also a great admirer of Jesus. He also respected religious belief (but not as taught by institutional churches) as a source of meaning in life. There’s an interesting passage in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, where Zarathustra meets a religious saint in the forest and, recognizing how meaningful religion was to him, decides he has nothing new to teach him. This is from the Walter Kaufmann translation:

      “And what is the saint doing in the forest?” asked Zarathustra.
      The saint answered: “I make songs and sing them; and when I make songs, I laugh, cry, and hum: thus I praise God. With singing, crying, laughing, and humming, I praise the god who is my god. But what do you bring us as a gift?”
      When Zarathustra had heard these words he bade the saint farewell and said: “What could I have to give you? But let me go quickly lest I take something from you!” And thus they separated, the old one and the man, laughing as two boys laugh.

  5. Just passing by. Thank you for the thought-provoking introduction. My curiosity about the meaning of “amor fati” led me to read the whole piece 🙂
    My father is a big fan of Nietzche’s work, but I have yet to attempt reading any of his work-now I have a reason too. Honestly, I was a bit hesitant given the general narrative around his work.

    I think I have been practicing his philosophy this whole time without knowing. My interpretation is that his message seems to be about living in the moment and embracing the beautiful or not-so-beautiful that comes with it. There is a sense of relief that comes with living in the moment, unbothered by the what-ifs of the past or the could-bes of the future-just existing and accepting every moment as it comes. This is what life might be all about. Accepting the seasons of life as they pass through us, and the belief that it will all be worth it at the end. Accepting that each moment serves a specific purpose that we may not realize until later on.

    Thank you, Guy!

    1. Thank you! Nietzsche can be intimidating since he doesn’t “pull punches” in his writing, and some of his ideas may be very jarring to people who disagree with him. If it helps, when I read books by philosophers I always maintain an inner dialog/argument with them. Sometimes they convince me of their opinions, and sometimes I come away believing they were wrong (always based on some rational counter-argument). So, to me it’s an educational process, not a matter or accepting any philosophy as-is.
      Yes, your description is apt. Nietzsche believed that the greatness of a person, which in turn makes their lives most meaningful and gives them the greatest joys in good times, depends on whether/how they endure hardships. As he famously put it, “That which does not kill us makes us stronger.”

  6. Articolo bellissimo e scritto benissimo. Mi porto via una cosa: amare la vita non significa negare il brutto, ma riuscire a dire ‘sì’ anche a quello. Non facile, ma potente. Grazie per averlo condiviso.

Leave a Reply to LauraCancel reply

Up ↑

Discover more from Guy Tal | Photographer, Author

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading